Search for: "Gooding v. Oliver" Results 141 - 160 of 616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2008, 3:44 am
If you have other good examples, please post them.800-pound gorilla: a very powerful beast with superhuman (or superjudicial) power to protect a convicted servicemember. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
 Even today, though, “hacker” may be good. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
This language continued in emails that Mr Perry sent to the good judge's clerk. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
As Oliver LJ pointed out at p 464, Lord Diplock in Erven Warnink at p 744 stated that a plaintiff must have “used the descriptive term long enough on the market in connection with his own goods and have traded successfully enough to have built up a goodwill for his business”, and, as Oliver LJ then observed, this “emphasises the point that goodwill (as opposed to mere reputation) does not exist here apart from a business carried on here”. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
He also refers to reminders of when the rule of law has failed, specifically he refers to the statue outside Parliament of Oliver Cromwell as a signatory of the death warrant of Charles I. 1423: Aidan O’Neill QC states we can be made richer by hearing different voices from other rooms. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At FiveThirtyEight, Oliver Roeder and Galen Druke speculate that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s silence during the challengers’ argument on Tuesday in Whitford suggests that “things don’t look good for extreme partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
 © Jocelyn BosseMarcel Pemsel evaluated the protection of short jingles as trade marks in light of the recent EUIPO Board of Appeal decision, which confirmed the rejection of Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe's application for a two-second long sound mark in class 39 (‘Transportation; passenger transport; packaging of goods; storage of goods; organization of trips’) due to lack of distinctiveness. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
    But Riverside also has a Federal Court outpost, and that's where they've been trying the Mattel v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am by Robert Steele
App. 3d 735, 586 N.E.2d 679 (1991); see also State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The defendant handed the goods over to a delivery company in Italy. [read post]