Search for: "Goodwin v. Hale" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:34 am by Andrew Ramonas
Harper, who represented the plaintiffs in the American Indian trust funds lawsuit, Cobell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Goodwin v NGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 1437 (QB) (09 June 2011): Identity of Fred Goodwin’s alleged mistress to remain secret but her occupation to be revealed. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am by Cameron Kerry
I leave it to others like former FTC Consumer Protection Bureau chief Jessica Rich and colleagues at Kelley Drye & Warren; Kirk Nahra and Wilmer Hale; Omer Tene of Goodwin; and Jim Dempsey in Lawfare to explore these other aspects of the ANPRM. [read post]