Search for: "Goodwin v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The trial court held the class action was barred because Iskanian had signed an arbitration agreement waiving any participation in a “class action” or “representative action,” but the California Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Goodwin Liu, held that because PAGA allowed an individual to act as a “proxy” for the state, the Federal Arbitration Act’s “goal of promoting arbitration as a means of private dispute resolution does not… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
”) Goodwin v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
This week the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
B&B Hardware v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
The Florida case is Eghnayem v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Justice Goodwin Liu filed a twenty-one-page dissent from the eighty-three-page majority opinion. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
John Ella of Jackson Lewis on the firm’s Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Report NLRB Toasts Chicago Bakery On English-Spanish Translation – San Diego attorney Daniel Lac of DLA Piper on the firm’s blog, The Labor Dish Four Things To Do Now BEFORE An Employee Data Breach – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Congratulations on your big win! [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am
Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP’s Washington, D.C., office, with twenty-five minutes of time. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Citing Goodwin’s Case, 82 Mass.App.Ct., 642 (2012), which stated that “a major cause need not be more than fifty percent. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Citing Goodwin’s Case, 82 Mass.App.Ct., 642 (2012), which stated that “a major cause need not be more than fifty percent. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Citing Goodwin’s Case, 82 Mass.App.Ct., 642 (2012), which stated that “a major cause need not be more than fifty percent. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 1:47 pm
The case is Huskey v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:02 pm
Judge Trott, joined by Judge Goodwin, fully agrees with everything Judge Fletcher says. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
In Gregory v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm
”’” (Citing Berghuis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:38 am
”’” (Citing Berghuis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am
"Justice Goodwin Liu wrote a separate concurring opinion. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:08 am
Goodwin (Ga. [read post]
