Search for: "Goodwine v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368 (1982) (presumption of vindictiveness “may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence”); see also Bordenkircher v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:26 pm
Corrigan, and Goodwin Liu. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
Goodwin, Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
Kannappan, S-1500-CV-266034-WDE, Superior Court for Kern County, California (Bakersfield). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
Kannappan, S-1500-CV-266034-WDE, Superior Court for Kern County, California (Bakersfield). [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:36 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
If that is not enough to tempt you, at lunchtime, we will be welcoming California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin Liu as our keynote speaker. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm
Marketing and several of their employees were sued in an action in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
On 19 January 2015, Mew J in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the libel case of Bernstein v Poon 2015 ONSC 155. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
In its decision in Chrismon, et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Goodwin identifies Buck v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
HipSaver, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
It did not consider or endorse any specific legislation, but the pathway suggested was reasonably clear from the relentless criticism of economic writings, judicial opinions (including most Supreme Court antitrust opinions dating from General Dynamics), and other landmark scholarship of antitrust law and economics of the past half-century. [read post]
