Search for: "Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company" Results 181 - 200 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anthony D. Romero
 In 2006, the court ruled against Lilly Ledbetter, who had been paid less than male colleagues in comparable jobs at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:43 pm by James Galvin
Steel Corp. 06366QR82 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Oracle Corp. 06366QM46 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Alcoa, Inc. 06366QM53 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to American Express Co. 06366QM61 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Boeing Co. 06366QM79 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Caterpillar, Inc. 06366QM87 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Citrix Systems Inc 06366QN29 Bank… [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Democratic staffers were quietly, yet urgently, crafting legislation to reverse the 5-4 ruling during what was supposed to be recess week on the Hill. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am by Erin Miller
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, the Court limited the time period in which plaintiffs claiming discrimination could recoup lost wages. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This was one of the facts that motivated Lilly Ledbetter to challenge pay discrimination she suffered while working in a tire manufacturing plant for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
It did not however, change the requirement, mandated in the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, that Title VII claimants must identify and challenge discrete pay decisions. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 13, April 21 and April 28 conferences)   Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Senate Judiciary Committee, Intellectual Property Subcommittee, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act at 22: What is it, why was it enacted, and where are we now (archived video; apparently you have to wait 13 minutes before the hearing actually starts, though)Sen. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The OFCCP’s definition of “similarly situated” for the purposes of evaluating compensation differences in its new sex discrimination regulations is so broad that it provides little guidance for federal contractors and goes beyond Title VII standards, two attorneys who handle OFCCP compliance matters recently told Employment Law Daily. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:22 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
On this point, he questioned: (1) whether these comparisons would be made by race/sex/ethnicity for each EEO-1 category separately or for all EEO-1 categories aggregated and weighted; and (2) would there be different comparisons for different industries and different comparisons for different size companies? [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am by MBettman
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 70 Ohio App.3d 656 (8th Dist. 1991) (“The courts appear to be supportive of employers’ attempts to create a safe working environment by holding that drug-testing does not constitute an invasion of the employees’ common law right to privacy. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 13 and April 21 conferences)   Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]