Search for: "Gorbatov v Tsirelman"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 6:16 am
In a fairly rare application of CPLR 3126, the complaint was stricken in Gorbatov v Tsirelman Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
It is not often you get a short precise decision which lays out what and how a Legal Malpractice and a Judiciary Law 487 case may be proven, but Gorbatov v Tsirelman 2017 NY Slip Op 07979 [155 AD3d 836] November 15, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department is just that. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
Gorbatov v Tsirelman 2017 NY Slip Op 07979 [155 AD3d 836] November 15, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department is an example of allegations of legal malpractice and Judiciary Law § 487 that the Second Department find sufficient to avoid dismissal under CPLR 3211. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
Here in Gorbatov v Tsirelman 2017 NY Slip Op 07979 Decided on November 15, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department is a further lesson, this time from the Second Department. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
. must be stated with particularity’ ” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:14 am
“[A] Judiciary Law § 487 cause of action requires that the alleged deceit occurred during a judicial proceeding in which the plaintiff was a party” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]). [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘Allegations regarding an act of deceit . . . must be stated with particularity'” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615). [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
“[V]iolation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive, whereas a legal malpractice claim is based on negligent conduct” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [citation omitted]; see Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 838). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack… [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:02 am
However, to the extent the plaintiff seeks an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
” “Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201; Pasternack v Laboratory Corp.… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am
However, to the extent Shubaderov and Egorov seek an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am
” “With respect to the legal malpractice cause of action insofar as asserted by Mid City against the defendants, the complaint was required to contain factual information showing that the attorneys’ actions, inter alia, proximately caused Mid City to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 838). [read post]
