Search for: "Gordon v. City Council" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 7:19 am by gstasiewicz
According to the Arizona Daily Star, in response to a threat by Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon to challenge the new illegal immigration law, “Phoenix City Attorney Gary Verburg said only the City Council has the power to authorize lawsuits. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The judgment by Mr Justice Hayden, in Westminster City Council v H ([2017] EWHC 1221 (Fam)) concerning the case of ‘H’, the 15 year old boy at the centre of the Telegraph story we reported on here, was published  on 19 May 2017. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm by azatty
He has gotten pushback from Republican members of the City Council, but Gordon says the City Charter permits him to move forward without a council vote. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council, heard 11 May 2017. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Gordon County Includes the cities of Calhoun, Fairmont, Ranger, Resaca and Plainville. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:14 am
Graham, and is the heart of the issue in Salazar v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Gordon & Ors as Trustees of the Inter Vivos Trust of the late William Strathdee Gordon v Campbell Riddell Breeze Paterson LLP (Scotland), heard 19 Jul 2017. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dover District Council v CPRE Kent, heard 16 Oct 2017. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 1:41 am
Head of Legal analyses YL v Birmingham City Council, an important case on the Human Rights Act. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Canada Lethbridge and District Pro-Life Association v Lethbridge (City), 2020 ABQB 654 M David Gates J found that the City’s decision to ban a number of anti-abortion advertisements was unreasonable. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, James M. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from… [read post]