Search for: "Gordon v. Sales" Results 81 - 100 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Accordingly, the appellate court vacated the preliminary injunction to the extent that it enjoined the sale of products that the mark owner chose not to buy back, and it remanded the case for reexamination of which product lines were covered by the injunction (Really Good Stuff, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
Kroma was the licensee of the KROMA marks in the European market, and it alleged that the sales of allegedly infringing beauty products infringed its rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:09 am by centerforartlaw
In 2019, Belinda sought to sell two works of art, arguing that the relationship between her and her sisters was so poor that they would be unable to manage the collection of 62 works together.[25] Belinda made it clear that a sale was necessary because a fair division of the art was impractical. [26] The lawsuits were not limited to questions of the estate but also included blocking sales. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm by Mike
Gordon argued that the Bankruptcy Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter because of Marshall v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  What happens if asset sales don’t raise enough is unknown. [read post]
Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Limited & Ors [2020] EWHC 124 (Ch) This case is an interesting commentary on the route that rights holders can pursue in order to challenge lookalike products. [read post]