Search for: "Gottlieb v Gottlieb"
Results 401 - 417
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
In my world, the Court could just say (i) yes, RAM breached; (ii) the "harm" resulting from the alleged breach is difference between the value of the merger consideration and, lets say, the cover bid; (iii) such damages are calculable and equal to $X; (iv) money damages, being easily measured, are the preferred remedy; and (iv) to the extent $X exceeds a voluntary limitation on money damages you can't now complain that a damages award will not make you whole; (v) you can… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:28 am
Slip-N-Slide Records, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 5:59 am
Cleary Gottlieb may have gone too far, reports Anthony Lin at the NYLJ when it spoke with a potential deposition witness. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:12 am
Gottlieb is still able to get any reading done; I have had a tough time of keeping at it since law school. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
" Gottlieb, 426 F.3d at 338. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:00 am
This week on our legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's punitive damages decision, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:44 pm
In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:44 pm
In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:47 am
In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:33 am
Gottlieb of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:01 am
Gottlieb v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Mercante, a partner at Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, analyze the recent Supreme Court decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
This issue is dealt with in Park Place Estates v. [read post]
