Search for: "Gover v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by Josh Sturtevant
However, many readers of this blog might be able to agree that state interests don't always align perfectly with the interests of the people. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by Josh Sturtevant
However, many readers of this blog might be able to agree that state interests don't always align perfectly with the interests of the people. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am by John L. Welch
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:50 am by Steve Lombardi
And that’s what makes the Iowa judiciary work so well as the third branch of our State goverment. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:42 am by Catriona Murdoch
Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) – Read judgment It is a sometimes controversial aspect of immigration law that asylum seekers facing a real risk of persecution will nevertheless be denied the protection of the Refugee Convention, through the application of Article 1F of that Convention. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:22 am by Eric
MGA Entertainment (VeRO notice is govered by 512(f)) and the partially related 10th Circuit ruling in Dudnikov v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm by Gyi Tsakalakis
Should the Goverment Regulate Commercial Speech on the Internet? [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Bob Foster, my colleague in the ABA's State and Local Goverment Law section, is one of the authors and recently posted SJC ["Supreme Judicial Court," for us non-Mass lawyers] on Regulatory Takings: That Word Does Not Mean What You Think It Means, a post about the court's recent decision in Blair v. [read post]