Search for: "Governing Board v. Phillips" Results 101 - 120 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
” The much-quoted line comes from West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” For the Tribune News Service (via Governing), Chuck Lindell reports that in Monday’s ruling in Azar v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
The Board had prepared a Scheme governing the suspension and expulsion of pupils. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm by Ilya Somin
He has long defended the Supreme Court’s notorious decision in Kelo v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:17 am by admin
Tony Mauro at the National Law Journal, Laura Meckler of the Wall Street Journal, and Kate Phillips at the Times’ Caucus blog also review the partisan reaction. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Druid City Hospital Board, 459 So.2d 818, 822-23 (Ala. 1984), which uniquely held that a hospital could be liable as a “seller” of a product under an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose theory. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
" [speaking of Phillips v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:53 am by Adam Wagner
Most interesting are the comments of Lord Phillips, the head of the Supreme Court, who said: if Parliament did the inconceivable, we might do the inconceivable as well. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
The contracts govern the registry and administration of a dozen new gTLD’s. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba  v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]