Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Company v. United States of America" Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
Porteadores argued that the ICA did not have jurisdiction over the dispute because it was a foreign company and because its corporate activities in the United States were governed by the North American Free Trade Agreement, not Arizona comp law. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 It is with that in mind that I take this opportunity to let people know that I have posted a new discussion draft, "Chinese State-Owned Companies and Investment in Latin America and Europe. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The employers no longer have a responsibility to report their denials to the government or the insurance company. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
Kentucky law also recognizes the doctrine of equitable subrogation, which permits an insurance company to "step into the shoes" of the insured and recover what the insured would have been able to recover against a tortfeasor. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm
 Pix Credit here I take this opportunity to let people know that I have posted a new discussion draft, "Chinese State-Owned Companies and Investment in Latin America and Europe. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in  Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]