Search for: "Grace v. C. I. R" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
do rather more to expose the formula for deciding those criteria, which properly should also be subject to consultation. (2) More by way of observation, Nicol J's version of truth on the meaning of reasonable preference shows just how far we have travelled since the heady days of R(A/Lindsay) v Lambeth LBC [2002] HLR 57. (3) I can't help feeling that Mr Babakandi had a right to have the decision to exclude him from bidding due to rent arrears reviewed (s… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
do rather more to expose the formula for deciding those criteria, which properly should also be subject to consultation. (2) More by way of observation, Nicol J's version of truth on the meaning of reasonable preference shows just how far we have travelled since the heady days of R(A/Lindsay) v Lambeth LBC [2002] HLR 57. (3) I can't help feeling that Mr Babakandi had a right to have the decision to exclude him from bidding due to rent arrears reviewed (s… [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:59 am by Robin Shea
But this is a very hot issue right now – keep particular watch on the case of Coats v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:47 am
” The envelopes and stationary used in the mailing displayed the organization's name, and listed its address as “c/o Grace Baptist Church” in Mount Vernon. [read post]