Search for: "Grand Jury Proceedings--united States, in Re"
Results 1 - 20
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 5:57 am
The article opened thusly:The United States has had to discard anachronistic institutions throughout its history, and it is now time to bury another — the grand jury. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:54 am
Here are some re-election figures:The chief prosecutors in the 2,344 separate prosecutorial districts in the United States hold very secure jobs. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:45 am
If you're the target of a federal investigation you need to understand the best ways to avoid arrest and prosecution.Here is a sample of a target letter given by the Justice Department for use by Assistant United States Attorneys in federal criminal prosecutions:This letter is supplied to a witness scheduled to appear before the federal Grand Jury in order to provide helpful background information about the Grand Jury. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: In re Grand Jury Matter #3, 2017 WL 383361 (2017) (per curiam). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
The language of “particularized need” comes from United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Nixon, President of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
Each district has its own United States District Court and its own United States Attorney. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm
We suspect that, because of McKeever, the Mueller grand jury materials will not see the light of day until a Democrat is appointed Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In re: Grand Jury 16-3817 (16-4) United States of America, 2018 WL 3156935 (CA4 June 27, 2018) (available here). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In re: Grand Jury 16-3817 (16-4) United States of America, 2018 WL 3156935 (CA4 June 27, 2018) (available here). [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
But see United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:07 am
This means grand jury proceedings are excluded. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:20 pm
The same day, Judge Robinson ordered that, “by no later than March 28, 2013, the United States shall file a memorandum in which In re Application of the United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
Grand juries aren’t like trial juries. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:53 am
(citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 604 F.2d at 806). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Johanson), 632 F.2d 1033, 1040 (3d Cir. 1980) (citing 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S. 683, 702 (1974) (pretrial subpoenas duces tecum); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 696 F. 3d 428, 432 (CA5 2012) (grand jury subpoenas); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 616 F. 3d 1186, 1201 (CA10 2010) (same). [read post]
