Search for: "Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am
Twin Books v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am
Twin Books v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am
Twin Books v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
The Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is soliciting public comment on a proposed revision of its current hours-of-service (HOS) regulations, which limit the operating hours of commercial truck drivers. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
However, the risk of enforcement is particularly acute for businesses in the following industries, designed for heightened enforcement and other attention as “Low Wage High Violation Industries” based on their particularly high record of noncompliance: Agriculture, Amusement, Apparel Manufacturing, Auto Repair, Child Care Services, Construction, Food Services, Guard Services, Hair, Nail & Skin Care Services, Health Care, Hotels… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on another of yesterday’s grants, Madison v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
On July 26, 2000, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:20 am
The leading recent case in Kentucky is Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Eric McGhee, the co-creator of an analytical measure of partisan advantage in redistricting relied on by the challengers in Gill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen — who took the lead in blowing open the (separate) Richart Ruddie/Profile Defenders deindexing fraud story — has just gone to court to set aside the order in one such case, Welter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Thus, it is essential when making a generic trade mark claim to clearly identify the goods and services related to the product: in fact, a mark maintains its validity if the public can describe “who” the mark is, conversely, the mark loses its validity if the public only understands “what” the service is Kellog Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 460, 86 S. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Public buildings are subject to the same rules. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Hewlett-Packard Co., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
