Search for: "Grant v. Bush et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
[i] Frost JJ, et al., Publicly Funded Contraceptive Services at U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 10:57 am
Freedom from Religion Foundation, et al. (06-157, petition here) -- puts before the Justices for the first time the Bush Administration's controversial policy of extending financial aid to "faith-based" groups. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 5:44 pm
The lead case among six government appeals is Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
In denying review of a petition in Jackson, et al., v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
In the final cases among those granted on Tuesday, Global-Tech Appliances, et al., v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Meese v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
In summing up its record on Guantanamo releases, the letter said that, aside from the five detainees involved in the new case now awaiting the Court’s attention (Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:55 am
Obama, et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
Obama (10-746) and Khadr, et al., v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Yousuf, et al. (08-1555). [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:15 pm
No, “Justice” Scalia, I won’t “get over” Bush v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
" In Center Townhouse Corp et. al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
Flores, et al., 08-289, and Arizona House Speaker, et al., v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:09 am
The second case the Court granted Monday was CompuCredit Corp., et al., v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm
(The petition in Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Retired Federal JudgesAmicus brief of Former Intelligence Professionals et al.Reply of petitioner Howes v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
Scientific-Atlanta, et al. (06-43), due to be heard by the Court on Oct. 9. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, et al. and Alaska v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm
The case was Hollingsworth, et al., v. [read post]
