Search for: "Grant v. City of Mobile"
Results 21 - 40
of 448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 9:35 am
City of Dallas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
City of Mobile, Alabama, (SD AL, Sept. 28, 2018), is a challenge to the city's denial of zoning applications to construct a Buddhist meditation center in a residential district. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:24 am
Warden v City of Grove, 604 Fed. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:53 pm
T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:03 pm
Ling, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
T-Mobile argued that Freeman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
The October 7, 2011, decision of the federal district court in New York City in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Liability for cities after employee violations of the federal protections for persons with disabilities In Jones v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:47 pm
Rancho De Calistoga v City of Calistoga, 2015 WL 5158703 (9th Cir. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
Hot on the heels of the decision in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) (see our note here) comes this altogether more satisfying decision, Elkundi & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2021) EWHC 1024 (Admin), on the nature and enforceability of the duty under s. 193(2) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Before police from the City of Rosemount, Minnesota were notified and arrived at the scene, people, homes, and vehicles were contaminated. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:01 am
The District Court granted summary judgment to the city, and applying the Penn Central three-part test, the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:01 am
The District Court granted summary judgment to the city, and applying the Penn Central three-part test, the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:47 am
Foresite, LLC v City of Mobile Bd. of Zoning Adj., 2014 WL 1760992 (SDAL 5/2/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Standing, Wireless Communications [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 9:02 pm
City of Roswell and in M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:12 pm
The Zoning Board of Adjustment of Paramus, New Jersey appealed from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellees Sprint, T–Mobile and Omnipoint Communications in their challenge to the ZBA’s denial of a requested variance to a city zoning ordinance that prohibited the construction of monopoles to fill gaps in wireless service. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:04 am
T-Mobile Seeks To Bridge Coverage Gap The most recent victory by the wireless industry is T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:20 am
City of Gadsden, 493 So. 2d 1374 (Ala. 1986), and Green Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Cal. 2011) (AT&T Mobility followed); Murphy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am
This is particularly the case in the ICT and IoT fields, which have recently witnessed an increase in the number of granted patents, and related disputes.Sisvel v Xiaomi One such dispute has recently taken place in the Netherlands, i.e. [read post]
