Search for: "Grant v. Clayton County, Georgia*" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Clayton County, Georgia thought it was already illegal to discriminate against people based on who they love or how they self-identify. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
Clayton County, Georgia, 17-1618 Issue: Whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of … sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
In brief, we had the following grants: Mathena v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Clayton County, Georgia, 17-1618 Issue: Whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of … sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:24 am by Susan Brenner
  According to the opinion, the case began when, “on the afternoon of September 27, 2010”, two police officers who had “receiv[ed] complaints from the community about suspicious activity,” conducted “surveillance of a residence” in Clayton County where Smoot lived “along with several other women. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
Clayton County, Georgia) is among the most controversial cases of this term. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Clayton County, Georgia, in which the court held that federal employment discrimination law protects gay and transgender employees, at Subscript Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Clayton County that discrimination on the basis of sex includes discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Clayton County, Georgia, 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
The Supreme Court took a case raising a similar question in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
And one new grant in a case involving Yeezy’s latest persona. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
Clayton County, which held that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Clayton County—concludes that class certification is improper: one of the plaintiffs lacks standing because it is statutorily exempt from Title VII, and the other is indeed entitled to an exemption under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm by Gene Takagi
Clayton County, Georgia (2020) (held: “An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII. [read post]