Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 81 - 100
of 412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
They included FDA’s top official, then-acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Susan Mayne, director of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Judy McMeekin, associate commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, and Catherine Hermsen, assistant commissioner of the agency’s Office of Criminal Investigations. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
On 7 April 2022, the Attorney General was granted an interim injunction restraining the BBC from broadcasting a programme that identified an alleged MI5 covert human intelligence source (“X”), Attorney General v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 380 (QB). [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
” YouTube moved to dismiss and the court granted the motion. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
The injunction was also granted to the claimant in respect of the harassment claim [41]. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Mullin’s investigative journalism helped secure the release of six men wrongly convicted for the attacks in 1991. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
The Biden administration can also stop the flow of federal grants to schools that fund police officers in schools. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
All three Claimants in Blake, Seymour and Thorp v Fox [2021] EWHC 3463 (QB) were granted relief from sanctions for failure to serve a Reply and Defence to the counterclaim, and no order was made on the Defendant’s application for Default Judgement. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Supreme Court case Holder v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Also important was the courts efforts, preemptively, to consider the effects of the PRC Data Security Law and [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Here, the Court noted that Plaintiffs pointed to no statute that granted the board authority to place conditions on the real parties’ registration to lessen its environmental effects. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
--Aliens granted status under this section as Priority 2 refugees of special humanitarian concern under the refugee resettlement priority system shall be considered to satisfy the requirements under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157) for admission to the United States.SEC. 3. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 9:14 am
Michael Weiner unpacks the new, amended complaint in FTC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:03 pm
Michael Weiner unpacks the new, amended complaint in FTC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am
He also found that Magistrates Courts retain the power to adjourn further under s.54 of the 1980 Act, as Mr Justice Mitting found in Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis v Hooper (2005) EWHC 340 (Admin). [read post]
