Search for: "Grant v. Crook" Results 1 - 20 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
This autocracy threat tracker is also available as a PDF file. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
” One minute later, Trump again posted about the judge’s daughter, saying she “represents Crooked Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, and other Radical Liberals. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Far worse, I saw that much of what journalists take for granted about law is simply wrong. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit’s 141-page opinion upholding Kapoor’s conviction intact as powerful precedent to use against crooked pharmaceutical executives. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
And then there was Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Impeachment Disqualification Clause] grants Congress the power to prevent a convicted party from being appointed to a federal position, but does nothing to prevent a convicted party from being elected to the House, Senate or the presidency. [read post]