Search for: "Grant v. Harris et al" Results 161 - 180 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff, defendants’ former client, contends that “but for” defendants’ negligence he would have obtained a favorable jury verdict in his underlying personal injury action against the owner and driver of a truck (Caso v Santos, et al. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for amici curiae Apple Inc., et al. and James W. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:06 pm
HUDSPETH COUNTY UNDERGROUND WATER CONSERVATIONDISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL.; from Hudspeth County; 8th district(08-04-00296-CV & 08-05-00115-CV, 209 SW3d 172, 08-31-06)3 motions for rehearingjudgment issued March 30, 2008, withdrawncorrected judgment issuedSupplemental Per Curiam OpinionBrookshire Grocery v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
On December 15, 2009, the trial court granted Haynes's motion, denied Ouzenne's motion, and entered a judgment confirming the arbitrator's award. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
OLIVER OKOLI; from Harris County; 1st district (01-07-00103-CV, 263 SW3d 275, 06-28-07) Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remandsMarks v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
  One moved up:  The Court granted cert. in the one-time relist Florida v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am by Dan Harris
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
CNH America LLC, et al. , a 6-page opinion on a petition for rehearing, Sr. [read post]