Search for: "Grant v. Maine Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
The main argument of the Appellants was that the mandatory requirements of the sponsor guidance fell within the scope of s 3(2). [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliate for Maine: UCP of Northeastern Maine 700 Mt. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2008 U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The licensing agency still maintains the ultimate control whether to grant the license. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
The Department also proposes to clarify language in DWD chapter 140 regarding hearing records, Department assistance for people with disabilities at hearings, and to correct minor and technical language in DWD chapter 140. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:31 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
District Court judge granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding the state-created danger theory was inapplicable, there was no supervisory liability and the Maine Department of Health was not responsible under the municipal liability theory. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (DIFW) estimates that there are currently more than 500 lynx in the state of Maine and claims the lynx population appears to be increasing. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
Indeed, IEEPA is (perhaps accidentally) an incredibly broad grant of power, and one which the Supreme Court blessed in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
Missouri Department of Corrections, (8th Cir., June 10, 2013), the 8th Circuit held that prison official's compelling interest in security justified their denial of group worship services for members of the Christian Separatist Church Society.In Small v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:06 am by Jack Goldsmith
No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001); Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am by Andrew Frisch
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections In this case Plaintiff, an employee of the South Carolina Department of Corrections (“SCDC”), sought compensation for overtime work under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]