Search for: "Grant v. Pfizer Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Pfizer, Inc., no. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Pfizer, Inc., no. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:39 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued transfer orders in the two Tobacco "grant and hold" cases, Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:39 am
Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
The Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Division Three, has scheduled oral argument in Pfizer v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 9:26 am
Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., no. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 9:16 am
January 7, 2021), the Court granted in part the motion of Defendants Hospira, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. to stay Civil Action No. 20-0561 until 14 days after resolution of Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:59 pm
Links to each of the filed briefs can be found below: • Brief for Amici Curiae Eli Lilly and Company, Eisai Inc., Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc., Pfizer Inc., and Etiometry, Inc. in Support of Petitioner (brief) • Brief of Amicus Curiae by The Chartered Institute... [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:13 pm
The application (Pfizer v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 6:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
Promote Innovation v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2009 WL 214649 (2d Cir. 2009). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
" That continued competition is what Pfizer sought to interrupt with its stay application (Pfizer v. [read post]
In Pfizer off-label qui tam, Massachusetts District Court rejects broad implied certification theory
19 Sep 2010, 10:20 pm
Pfizer Inc, Judge Patty Saris of the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment to the company in the long-fought case. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:30 am
Federal Circuit's ruling that claims 1 through 3 of Pfizer's patent for the high blood pressure drug Norvasc are invalid for obviousness fails to raise the blood pressure of the requisite number of that court's judges needed to obtain rehearing en banc: Over the dissenting opinions of three judges, the Federal Circuit yesterday issued this order denying rehearing en banc in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm
Today, we review the amici curiae brief submitted by Eli Lilly and Company, Eisai Inc., Upsher-Smith Labroatories, Inc., Pfizer Inc.,... [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:48 pm
Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
Synthon IP v. [read post]
