Search for: "Grant v. Rose"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
. , Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Aaron Friedberg and Commissioner Jonathan Stivers 9:30 AM – 9:40 AM: Co-Chairs' Opening Remarks 9:40 AM – 11:10 AM: Panel I: Energy, Investment, and Economic Interests Erica Downs, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia SIPA [Testimony]Mohammed Soliman, Director of the Strategic Technologies and Cyber Security Program, Middle East Institute [Testimony]Karen Young, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Emma v MEC for Health Gauteng Province (2022/12482) [2024] ZAGPJHC 276 (15 March 2024) (saflii.org) This blog was authored by Brigitte Geyer, candidate attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
(LNC) v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Rose v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
…In any event I have in my first judgment indicated that I will grant a faculty for the etching of a rose to appear on the headstone. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La Rose v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
Lord Leggatt, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lady Rose made the majority decision. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Along with the Supreme Court’s affirmation of the high burden of proof employer must meet to justify refusing to grant religious accommodations to employees in Groff v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
The lawsuit, Authors Guild v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
In this post, Jaspal Pachu, Graham Muir and Jasleen Kaur at CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Vermilion Holdings Ltd [2023] UKSC 37, which was handed down on 25 October 2023. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:05 pm
In Hyland v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Acuff-Rose Music back in 1994. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
If you've been too wrapped up with preparations for the holiday season, here's a summary of the IP news that you might have missed last week:PatentsThis Kat is still contemplating which IP books to put on her Christmas wish-list...Rose Hughes outlined the recent EPO Board of Appeal decision (T 1356/21), which discussed the criterion of novelty for pharmaceutical dosage regimes and selection inventions, as well as the reliance on an unexpected technical effect for… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm
Patents Rose Hughes discussed the interpretation of G2/21 by the Board of Appeal in the T 0116/18 case and the fact that this interpretation considers the rejection of the language of plausibility, the divergence between the EPO and the UK courts and what it requires with regards to the disclosure of a technical effect relied on for inventive step. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
From Fideldy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
