Search for: "Grant v. Rose"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
This decision was considered by Mr Aughton to be "a serious mistake" and so he requested and was granted permission to continue working on GAGEpack. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Hodge Ch. was satisfied that the petitioners had shown a sufficient justification for the works and he granted a faculty. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
” On April 26, UMG held an earnings call in which it reported that revenues rose 11.5% year over year to $2.71 billion in the first quarter of 2023, largely driven by successful releases from Morgan Wallen, Taylor Swift, and the aforementioned Drake. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The latter rule of law treats material prepared for a client, such as an entity’s owner, as a “property right,” and a law firm has a “general duty to provide that material . . . upon . . . request absent a substantial showing of good cause to refuse client access” (Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLP, 294 AD2d 190 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
Lady Rose (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales and Lord Hamblen agreed) noted that (at [53]): “With respect to the tribunals below and the majority of the Inner House, I do not agree that evidence – or the absence of evidence – from a taxpayer about how he or she thought that the statutory provisions would apply to the grant is the key to deciding this case. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
Seed Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
Seed Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
The company was granted special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia, however the High Court revoked this grant of special leave on the basis that the grounds of appeal no longer concerned an issue of public importance. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
From Tharp v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
The allegations that Duma had acted corruptly and fraudulently in the grant of a petroleum licence were found to be false. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
The federal court has granted Lachlan Murdoch leave to expand his defamation case against Crikey and add the Private Media chairman, Eric Beecher, and its chief executive, Will Hayward, as respondents. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Prods. v R. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
English Rose Estates Ltd v Menon & Ors (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2022) UKUT 347 (LC) English Rose Estates appealed a First Tier Tribunal decision that the leases did not permit them to recover insurance premium charges from leaseholders. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
