Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Sullivan, 576 F.3d 522, 527 (D.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
Kho v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Sullivan. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
The brief relied on the famous case US v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
 The panelists were Philip Gelston, a corporate transactional partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP; Stuart Grant, co-founder of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.; Paul Rowe, a litigation partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; and Audra Cohen, a mergers and acquisitions partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
On March 26, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
On March 26, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm
Denedo, 556 U.S. 904 (2009), and this reply from Dwight Sullivan. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:26 am
However, Judge Sullivan (and many before him, such as the Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
Case is available at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-7412.pdf ------------------------- Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Danny Sullivan (no, not the race car driver Danny Sullivan featured in my last post) of Search Engine Land claims to have had the original scoop on the Rosenberg v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142, 1143 (9th Cir. 2010); Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:16 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Michael Sullivan Associates, LLP, Lexis WCAB Procedure—Substitution of Insurer for Employer—WCAB, after granting reconsideration, rescinded WCJ’s order dismissing defendant Michael Sullivan & Associates (Michael Sullivan) as party to workers’ compensation proceeding pursuant to Labor Code § 3755, and instead dismissed Michael Sullivan pursuant to Labor Code §§ 3757 and 3759, when record showed that Employers… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
“Yes,” Sullivan answers. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:34 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
