Search for: "Graves v. Carter" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm by Mark Bennett
In Anthony Graves’s first trial, prosecutor Charles Sebesta had to cheat to win, hiding exculpatory evidence and eliciting perjured testimony (Graves v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:45 pm
In the 5th Circuit's March 3, 2006, decision in Graves v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:23 am by Native American Rights Fund
(Child Custody; Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act)Carter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:14 pm by cdw
Graves was convicted in 1994 of assisting Robert Carter in multiple murders in 1992. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am by Marty Lederman
  Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am by O. Carter Snead
Carter Snead is the William P. and Hazel B. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:05 pm
 19.8 of the HCCCFA Act), and in many judicial decisions, including Carter v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Child Custody; Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act)Carter v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Compare RESTATEMENT (2D) AGENCY § 219 & comment c (master can use servant's defenses); RESTATEMENT (2D) AGENCY § 217 (master can assert servant's defenses with exception of privileges based on status); Carter v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Many organizations across the political spectrum have grave concerns about what New York is doing. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Hall
Carter, as he lay in the execution chamber in 2000, admitted Graves had nothing to do with the crime. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Vanessa Sauter shared the Lawfare Podcast, in which Steve Vladeck and Scott Anderson discuss the complexities of United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]