Search for: "Graves v. Texas Co." Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2014, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the court reversed the district court’s denial of Nationwide’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (Perret v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co, October 20, 2104, Graves, J, Jr). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am by Phil Dixon
The petitioner and two co-defendants were jointly tried for murder in 1994. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am by Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, and the Federal Insurance Co. et. al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46)   Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Missouri: The latest statement by the Missouri Supreme Court (in Whelan Security Co. v. [read post]