Search for: "Gray v. Hand"
Results 41 - 60
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that Ms… [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
On the other hand, in Vielbig v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm
On 5 November 2010 judgment was handed down in JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) – Read judgment. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
Healthvana, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
On 26 July 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down a reserved judgment after the trial in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group ([2011] EWHC 1884 (QB)). [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
On October 21, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Friebel v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports prefer to refer… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
Gray v Mutual of Omaha, Case No. 11-15016 (ED Mich) [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:21 am
The specifics of the antitrust evidence aside, it is now clear, at least in the federal courts, that plaintiffs no longer credibly can cite Eisen v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am
The Court of Appeal have listed the appeal which has been lodged by Glenn Mulcaire against the decision of Mr Justice Mann handed down on 17 November 2010 in Phillips v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Gray (2014) 58 Cal.4th 901, 909 (Gray).) [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the decision in Callery v Gray approving a figure as a reasonable premium in road traffic cases at the time has set that figure as a base-line and has resulted in the eradication of downward pressure in the market; and that the requirement for a Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil statement does not in practice ensure that premiums are competitive".Later the Report observes: "In Callery v Gray (Nos 1… [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
In Rodriques v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 8:38 am
In last week’s case (Power v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
A full Court returned to the question this week in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:17 am
Case Citation: Campos v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 2:40 pm
On the other hand, the finding that Superstrike Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:44 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
