Search for: "Gray v. Laws" Results 21 - 40 of 2,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Simon Stern, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, has posted The Trial of Dorian Gray, which is forthcoming in Dorian Gray in the Twenty-First Century, ed. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
Counsel for Ronald Gray, who is under a presidentially approved death sentence, filed his habeas petition yesterday in U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
  This decision, in the case of Gray v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)) is perhaps the most important so far of the various “phone hacking” judgments. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Gray (Maryland School of Law), Meagan Cooper (University of Maryland - Francis King Carey School of Law), & David McAloon (University of Maryland - Francis King Carey School of Law) have posted The Supreme Court’s Contemporary Silver Platter Doctrine (Texas Law Review, Vol. 91, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am by INFORRM
  Sir Charles Gray explains that, “in accordance with the established practice in Jersey” he retired with the Jurats to assist them with the law but did not express his own view. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:18 pm by Patent Docs
Gunnison of Ropes & Gray LLP will examine the Mayo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:50 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:43 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinions: State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:55 am by INFORRM
The judgment in Shergill v Purewal ([2010] EWHC 3610 (QB)) given on 15 December 2010 by Sir Charles Gray has now been posted on the indispensable Bailii website. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am by SHG
  Not only is this hardly a solution, but to suggest this red herring in the gray area of conflicted intent is to distract attention from the root problem of immunity as reflected in the nightmarish Supreme Court decision in Connick v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 11:36 am by Aimee Hess
In the recent opinion of Knopf v Gray, the Texas Supreme Court instructs as to the essence of a life estate under Texas law. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am by INFORRM
  Following his recent decision in Gray v UVW ([2010] EWHC 2367 (QB)), he again decided that, despite the parties having agreed a consent order including anonymity, the interests of the public required that the claimant be named. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:25 am
In the press release announcing charges against Santarlas, prosecutors also thanked Ropes & Gray for its cooperation. [read post]