Search for: "Gray v. No Named Respondents" Results 1 - 20 of 189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But the context is really simple: 1 name, 1 skater. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:58 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan also seemed sympathetic, indicating that the case was similar to the court’s 1998 decision in Gray v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
” Ropes and Gray Associate Edward Machin said the ICO’s approach could make it one of Europe’s most aggressive privacy regulators, InfoSecurity Magazine reports. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But with those names, the group wants to deliver would-be supporters’ email addresses and phone numbers to DeSantis. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Peter’s Pence Act) – there are a number of non-academic Lambeth Awards, including the Lambeth Cross, the Canterbury Cross and the Cross of St Augustine; in 2016, these awards were expanded with six new awards named after previous Archbishops of Canterbury. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
In Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd & Ors [2022] UKET 4110538/2019, Mr McClung was engaged by Doosan Babcock as a self-employed contractor via his own limited company, McClung Strategy and Projects Ltd, which was paid via the second respondent, NRL Ltd [2]. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
 Proof that the plaintiff has submitted "enough facts to enable [the] court to determine that a viable" cause of action exists (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d at 71; see Gray v Doyle, 170 AD3d at 971) may be established by an affidavit of a party or someone with knowledge, authenticated documentary proof, or by complaint verified by the plaintiff that sufficiently details the facts and the basis for the defendant's liability (see CPLR 105[u];… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 7:20 am
Responding to this development, the Swartzentruber Amish submitted a letter explaining that their religion forbids the use of such technology and “ ‘asking in the name of our Lord to be exempt’ ” from the new rule. [read post]