Search for: "Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
“Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with” (Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; see Washington Mut. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
” “Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with'” (Josephs v AACT Fast Collections Services., Inc., 155 AD3d 1010, 1012, quoting Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; accord Munoz v Reyes, 40 AD3d 1059, 1059; Ludmer v Hasan, 33 AD3d 594, 594). [read post]
