Search for: "Green v. Capital One" Results 1 - 20 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2004, 7:52 am
Darryl Green, et al., 343 F.Supp.2d 23 (D.Mass. 2004), Criminal No. 02-10301-NG (D.Mass, Nov. 3, 2004) -a capital case- whereby there would be two juries, one non-death qualified to decide guilt or innocence, and a second death-qualified jury to, if necessary, decide on punishment. [read post]
12 May 2005, 1:18 pm
Green, Criminal No. 02-10301-NG (D.Mass) (see Memorandum and Order Re: Bifurcation of November 3, 2004 and Additional Findings Re: Bifurcation of December 29, 2004) to empanel 2 juries in a capital case, one non-death-qualified to hear the guilt phase, and another death-qualified to hear the penalty phase if necessary. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Alexander J. Davie
Given their recent success this season, the timing of the Green Bay Packers’ decision to engage in another capital raise couldn’t be better. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
  Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't  absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of  Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
The Chinese banking sector is clearly more tightly controlled than the US one is; but is there any doubt that both, at their root, depend on the state for their lifeblood (cheap capital)? [read post]