Search for: "Green v. Kennedy" Results 121 - 140 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 9:12 am
  The Jessica's Law index, with full coverage of the Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:53 am by Erin Miller
  It noted however, that its decision did not follow from its 2003 decision in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
”  In other words, a green light to pretextual traffic stops. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
Finally, in a world finally getting a clue about getting green, the Paper LESS Office process is inherently green. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
John is a partner at Vinson & Elkins in D.C. who clerked for Justice Kennedy, and here's a revelation that will not surprise you: he specializes in appellate litigation. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am by Adam Chandler
Lawrence Hurley of ClimateWire (via the New York Times) and the New York Times’s Green blog discuss an amicus brief filed Monday by three Republican lawmakers in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marissa Miller
” At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner explains how the Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
This also explained Justice Anthony Kennedy’s reluctance in recent years to rule in favor of plaintiffs in political-gerrymandering cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Amy Howe
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
” Briefly: For this blog, Rory Little analyzed the Court’s opinion last week in Greene v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
Clement, for example, spoke more words in his six arguments than Kennedy in his 58. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So the only interesting question was really why now (and, of course, exactly what Kennedy would say, given that one could also predict that it would be he writing the opinion). [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm by Steven Boutwell
”[1]  The most recent Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision interpreting this “further processing exclusion,” Bridges v. [read post]