Search for: "Green v. Morales" Results 21 - 40 of 466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In 1967, Harvard’s Robert Green McCloskey took a major step forward when he published a new edition of The Works of James Wilson (first published in 1804 by Wilson’s son, Bird Wilson), along with a lengthy introduction, bibliographical essay, and detailed index. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Michael Green J held that trustees could do so, provided that they were careful about making investment decisions on purely moral grounds, recognising that the charity’s supporters and beneficiaries might have differing legitimate moral views on certain issues, and provided that they acted honestly, reasonably and responsibly in formulating an appropriate investment policy for the charity that was in its best interests. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:07 pm by Elizabeth Penava
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Cottrol is the Harold Paul Green Research Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 2:47 pm by Kalvis Golde
The post Jamaican green-card holder asks court to overrule precedent on “crimes involving moral turpitude” appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 We observe in closing that in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And there is a “cheesehead,” a rabid fan of the Green Bay Packers.Unsurprisingly, SA concluded from his straw man analogy that the religious Muslim and Jewish attorneys presented stronger grounds for an exception from the rule than did the football enthusiast. [read post]