Search for: "Green v. Philip Morris" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2007, 9:09 pm
In case you imagine that tobacco companies' litigation problems are going away -- notwithstanding the damaging California ruling discussed by Michael two weeks ago, the equivocal outcome in Philip Morris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am by John Elwood
  From last week’s list, Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
Taylor Borzu Sabahi & Kabir Duggal, Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm by Will Baude
Philip Morris, Inc., 929 F.Supp. 416, 419 (S.D.Fla.1996) (“Logic and case law dictate that a conspiracy to commit negligence is a non sequitur”); Rogers v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 In the meantime, Reuters is reporting that BAT is planning to appeal the decision, whereas Philip Morris has not (see press release here). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
We've already posted a number of items about Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Philip Morris appealed, and for the third time, the high court took the case. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Philip Morris. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
  The District Court observed that in Green v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm by Law Lady
Philip Morris USA, 27 No. 26 Westlaw Journal Tobacco Industry 2, Westlaw Journal Tobacco Industry September 7, 2012Finding that individual issues predominate, New Hampshire's highest court has decertified a class-action lawsuit alleging Marlboro Lights cigarettes are overvalued because they do not offer any added health benefits than traditional cigarettes. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm by Law Lady
Philip Morris USA, 27 No. 26 Westlaw Journal Tobacco Industry 2, Westlaw Journal Tobacco Industry September 7, 2012Finding that individual issues predominate, New Hampshire's highest court has decertified a class-action lawsuit alleging Marlboro Lights cigarettes are overvalued because they do not offer any added health benefits than traditional cigarettes. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
Part V explains the relevance of the consistent approaches and argues that ICSID tribunals have established a jurisprudence constante in dealing with SCEs that confirms their access as claimants in investor-state disputes. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) TTAB finds no violation of section 10 in assignment of intent-to-use application for YING YANG VODKA: Philip Restifo v. [read post]