Search for: "Green v. Richmond" Results 41 - 60 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2008, 8:12 am
The Richmond Times-Dispatch reports, "Kaine postpones Bell execution. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Frank Green has this story in the Richmond Times-Dispatch. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305: A municipal services agreement between the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California and the City of Richmond did not constitute a project for the purposes of CEQA. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
The appellants had relied upon the view of May J in Summers v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames [2018] EWHC 782 (Admin), [2018] 1 WLR 4729, at [24], that the expression “those in the locality” in section 59 of the 2014 Act “must be read to include those who regularly visit or work in the locality, in addition to residents”. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
AND LARRY DALE WISENER; from Lubbock County; 7th district (07-06-00209-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-28-08)08-0288 RICHMOND CONDOMINIUMS v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305: A municipal services agreement between the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California and the City of Richmond did not constitute a project for the purposes of CEQA. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:16 am by Steve Hall
"Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate death penalty for Justin Wolfe," is by Frank Green in the Richmond Times-Dispatch. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Andis Kaulins
Maryland Terps by 31 William & Mary24-23 Maryland 33-14 Richmond v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]