Search for: "Greenberg v. New York State"
Results 101 - 120
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 3:02 am
Here, however, the Supreme Court properly determined that the number, nature, and quality of the defendants' contacts with New York do not evince purposeful activities by which the defendants availed themselves of the benefits and protections of New York law (see Weiss v Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel & Wolff, 85 AD2d 861; see also Kimco Exch. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:34 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (R. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 1:31 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:23 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
The case is called Greenberg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 1:34 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:32 am
Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Daniel A. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:23 pm
New York State is on tough place to face a criminal charge. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:18 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:31 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:36 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:34 am
The leaping off point is first to define 'computer.' In New York today, most everything is a 'computer' because our state law gives the broadest definition possible. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:23 am
Greenberg, defendants-appellants
NEW YORK COUNTYContractsArt Buyer's Contract Claim Survives; Identity Of Principal Appears To Be Partially Disclosed Van Damme v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:47 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:29 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am
“The court declines to dismiss plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice pursuant to CPLR § 321 l(a)(l), on the basis of plaintiffs llocution under oath, because New York State courts have not taken a consistent position on whether an allocution that a client was satisfied with the services of his/her attorney precludes a client from bringing a claim for legal malpractice (See Boone v. [read post]
