Search for: "Greenberg v. Sellers"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2016, 12:52 pm
Greenberg v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 11:21 am
Koch v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 2:58 am
In this upstate Legal Malpractice Case, plaintiffs entered into a high stakes high risk real estate and mortgage deal with sellers, who were encumbered and hounded by the IRS, County tax liens, and other debts. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Feb. 2, 2012) (“argument[s] that the hospital is a product seller would have profound negative impact upon the services provided by a hospital to members of the public”; “the hospital is not selling the product but is offering the service”); Lambert v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487 (1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487 (2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:29 am
, Inc., 174 A.D.3d 682, 102 N.Y.S.3d 687 [2 Dept., 2019], citing Greenberg v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Because that deal removes bidders from the auction process for specific items, the court shouldn’t need much additional evidence to show how the seller was harmed in the process. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487(1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487(2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838). [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:30 am
Jordan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
(Think Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Bean v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
Greenberg, Golden Gate University [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Greenberg: has the DMCA aged well and will continue to age well? [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Editor’s Note: Eduardo Gallardo is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
