Search for: "Greene v Sager"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Greene v Sager ; 2010 NY Slip Op 08068 ; Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department is a twin story. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:05 pm
Green (Willamette University College of Law), Leslie C. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am
The decision in Greene v Sager 2011 NY Slip Op 50688(U) Decided on April 19, 2011 Supreme Court, Kings County Rivera, J. sets forth the various standards for a summary judgment motion, for legal malpractice, and describes, in great detail, the various evidentiary offers of the parties. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
""To succeed on a motion for summary judgment, a defendant must establish that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the cause of action" (Dupree v Voorhees, 68 AD3d 810, 811; see Greene v Sager, 78 AD3d 777). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
Sagers (Cleveland-Marshall School of Law). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
SAN FRANCISCO - Stephanie Lenz and Universal Music Publishing Group (UMPG) today announced they have amicably resolved Lenz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
in Snolis v Clare 2011 NY Slip Op 01455 ; Decided on February 22, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department the Court writes: "The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because they failed to establish that any negligence on the part of the defendants in failing to move for leave to amend the complaint in the personal injury action to add the owner as a defendant, immediately upon learning of the owner's identity,… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:16 am
No. in Snolis v Clare 2011 NY Slip Op 01455 ; Appellate Division, Second Department the Court writes: "The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because they failed to establish that any negligence on the part of the defendants in failing to move for leave to amend the complaint in the personal injury action to add the owner as a defendant, immediately upon learning of the owner's identity, was the proximate cause of… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
" "Here, contrary to the assertion of the law firm, it failed to meet its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Greene v Sager, 78 AD3d 777; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
Greene et al.; edited by Robert J. [read post]
