Search for: "Greene v. Fisher" Results 161 - 180 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:34 am
 A236 Greene -- Establishes a drug treatment alternative to incarceration for certain offenders; appropriation Same as S 816 BLURB : Cor. drug treat. alt. cert off. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
    Despite entering on a green light Madam Justice Fisher of the BC Supreme Court found the Plaintiff to be 100% responsible for this collision and dismissed the claim. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White, Honeyghan-Green v LB Islington & Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] UKHL 70 -   for anyone who hasn’t read it yet. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Outbreaks associated with fresh leafy green vegetables including iceberg lettuce and spinach are increasing. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:32 pm
Restrepo, 930 F.2d 705, 712 (9th Cir. 1991).Green v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
Aplin arrived in his green truck at the Fishers Super Target parking lot. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Why compulsory licenses are bad: a look at the sausage making process: (Techdirt) More on ACTA: (LawFont.com) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Brand Finance 500: the annual report on the world’s most valuable brands: (IP finance), Gretchen Olive’s ‘10 steps to an effective domain name policy’: (IPwar’s), ICANN approves GNSO proposals imposing financial penalty on registrars who engage in excessive domain… [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:58 am
The Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic today filed this Brief in Opposition in the case of Green v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Patents Rise of machine translation services: (IPKat), USPTO / EPO / JPO progress on ‘common application format’ for expedited examination: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), Proponents: ‘Time is now’ for TRIPs biodiversity amendment in Doha round: (Intellectual Property Watch), TRIPs amendment in favour of disclosures for genetic resources/traditional knowledge patents gathers support: (Afro-IP), WIPO… [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shabir, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 854 (07 March 2008) Zotiades, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 753 (14 March 2008) Fisher, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 714 (14 March 2008) Giga, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 703 (18 March 2008) Ikram & Anor, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 586 (19 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Honeygan-Green v London Borough of Islington [2008] EWCA Civ 363 (22 April 2008) Looe Fuels Ltd… [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
There are barristers in England & Wales for whom the word ‘trade’ conjures up the image of solicitors, feasting on the many provisions and opportunities in The Legal Services Act 2007, destroying The Bar’s green and pleasant land. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
In light of the foregoing, the trial court is instructed on remand to correct the child support withholding order to reflect that the deduction was to be $266.00 bi-weekly (from the date of the order until modified on January 13, 2005), and to calculate the child support arrearage, if any, consistent with this opinion.Pierre Fisher v. [read post]