Search for: "Greene v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Hines     Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green 09a0060n.06  USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Hines     Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green 09a0060n.06  USA v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that a three-judge panel on Thursday chose not to enter a preliminary injunction declaring Maryland’s sixth congressional district an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander; the court put further proceedings on hold pending the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:19 pm by Dave Maass
For the full amicus brief: https://www.eff.org/document/aclu-v-clapper-amicus-brief Contacts: David Greene Senior Staff Attorney Electronic Frontier Foundationdavidg@eff.org Ben Miller Communications Director Rep. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 6:12 am
”  With that opening sentence, the Michigan Supreme Court last month became the latest high court to give a “yes” answer, in Skanska USA Building Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, petitioner admits that he was employed by ACS for only seven months, and he failed to preserve for review his contention that ACS and his previous employer, the Department of Education, constituted a "single employer" (see Green v New York City Police Dept., 34 AD3d 262, 263 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, petitioner admits that he was employed by ACS for only seven months, and he failed to preserve for review his contention that ACS and his previous employer, the Department of Education, constituted a "single employer" (see Green v New York City Police Dept., 34 AD3d 262, 263 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:29 pm by Molly Runkle
Commentary comes from Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog, Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Libby Nelson of Vox, and Mark Joseph Stern of Slate, who also covered today’s opinion in Green v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[w]hen a Colorado ‘cake artist’ who refuses to serve same-sex weddings brings his case to the Supreme Court next month [in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Greene’s Energy Group, a challenge to the constitutionality of inter partes review, a process used to determine the validity of existing patents. [read post]