Search for: "Greenslade v. Greenslade"
Results 1 - 20
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
Daniel Sokol Jennifer V. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
Daniel Sokol Jennifer V. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:41 am
What is particularly striking is how this outcome appears to conflict with the cautionary tale that is the judgment in the injunction application of John Terry (LNS v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) and in particular the references to the relationship. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Roy Greenslade has a post on the “Astonishing story of a photographic agency’s surveillance exploits”. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
There is a post about this on Roy Greenslade’s blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
Speaking on a recent edition of BBC Radio 4’s “Media Show”, Professor Roy Greenslade predicted that Lord Justice Leveson will probably recommend “some kind of statutory regulation” of the press at the end of his inquiry. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Roy Greenslade, a long term critic of Mahmood and his methods, noted that “Mazher Mahmood’s journalistic game has finally been brought to book”. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
It's not quite eleven-a-side, but the much-contested case of Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA, Union de Associations de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Limited, Setanta Sports SARL, Group Canal Plus SA and The Motion Picture Association v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, Sanjay Raval, David Greenslade, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen; The Secretary… [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
Canada In the case of Caron v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
Subsequently, these questions may be answered in due course of Max Mosley v UK.For further analysis on the potential of Max Mosley v UK, see Roy Greenslade’s Guardian blog titled “Why Max Mosley is right - and wrong”Sources: BBC News, out-law.com, usatoday, steeleslaw.co.uk, GuardianPhoto: makeroadssafe [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am
Noting that Greenslade got the language from Bugg v Allied Industrial Workers Local 507, which expressly attributed it to the Supreme Court’s decision in Vaca v Sipes and other hybrid contract/DFR opinions, the appeals court found that this “approach does not bear any evident relation to Title VII;” thus, the court withdrew the language. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:52 am
In last week’s case (Kezel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:08 pm
The Press Gazette reported the Kentish Gazette and the Sun adjudications and there was also a post on the Greenslade blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am
This idea has been floated by Lord MacNally and is discussed on the Greenslade Blog and in the Press Gazette. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
There is a comment about the case on the Greenslade blog. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
This adjudication was also covered in the Press Gazette and also by Roy Greenslade. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
This was, in turn, picked up by Roy Greenslade on his blog. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
There is a discussion of their complaints on Roy Greenslade’s blog. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:17 am
” The decision is discussed on Roy Greenslade’s blog and on the BBC Northern Ireland website. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am
It is also worth reading the comments at the bottom of the Greenslade Blog. [read post]
