Search for: "Gregg v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by H. Scott Leviant
U-Haul Co. of California (Sept. 16, 2016), the Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed the trial Court's ruling that U-Haul could not assert an arbitration agreement to compel the plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee[s],” to determine in arbitration whether they had standing to pursue a PAGA claim.The Court agreed with Williams v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Edward Rubin
Georgia, where the Court declared capital punishment to be cruel and unusual, and the 1976 retrenchments, including Gregg v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Bourda, Turning the Water to Blood: How Burwell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's in his concurring opinion finding that Kentucky's lethal injection protocol had not been shown to be unconstitutional.In Gregg v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)); and Gregg v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Reflections on Justice John Paul Stevens's Concurring Opinion in Baze Rees A Fifth Gregg Justice Renounces Capital Punishment 43 U C Dav [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:28 am by Ryan Krueger and Matthew Tobias
Last month, the Sixth Circuit revived a lawsuit brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) alleging that a retailer’s commission policy was unlawful in Stein v. hhgregg, Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:56 am by Jeff Gamso
  Four years and three days later, on July 2, 1976, now by the vote of 7-2, in Gregg v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Gregg asserted that “he has not breached any civil or criminal law, whether in Australia or elsewhere”. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
The Defendant contends that, while the general process of lethal injection has notbeen found unconstitutional, the specific procedures and protocol recently adopted by theDepartment of Corrections fail constitutional standards as they do not protect theDefendant against the infliction of "unnecessary and wanton pain," Gregg v. [read post]