Search for: "Griggs v. Duke Power Co" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
Duke Power Co. at 67 Vanderbilt Law Review 197 (2014). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Duke Power Co., brought by thirteen African American employees who worked as common laborers and janitors at one of Duke Power’s facilities. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Dukes Power Co." published in Vanderbilt Law Review. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm by Greensboro Legal Blog
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 91 S.Ct. 849, 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr.
Duke Power Co. to Title VII employment discrimination claims to also apply to lending discrimination claims. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
  Source: More [read post]
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), held that Title VII’s disparate impact section, which, at the time, was identical to the current ADEA language, extended to both employees and job applicants. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 5:34 pm by Fred Berni
Read more: If not developed and validated properly, your potential legal ramifications can be huge. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Duke Power Co., of nearly identical language of Title VII, which has been held to protect job seekers. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
When the Court abruptly changed its mind in 1989, effectively eviscerating the Griggs standard in Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]