Search for: "Griggs v. Griggs"
Results 121 - 140
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2020, 12:09 pm
Supreme Court first recognized disparate impact discrimination in Griggs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
A United States, 5th Circuit case styled, Griggs v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Its decisions in Griggs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:52 pm
February 7 - State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:42 pm
Mejia, 28 So.3d 79 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2009), Griggs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, in which the Court authorized the use of busing to achieve school integration; Griggs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
” Griggs v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:04 pm
" (Grigg Decl., Ex. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
The problem with barring those with conviction records, as explained by the United States Supreme Court in Griggs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:02 am
Supreme Court decision on disparate impact discrimination in employment is Griggs v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:36 pm
The basic law on tests and other job qualifications that have a disparate impact based on protected characteristics such as race and gender was pronounced by the Supreme Court in 1971 in Griggs v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Grigg
• Mejia v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court of the United States stated long ago in Griggs v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm
., Griggs-Ryan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:22 am
Supreme Court identified this claim in Griggs v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:30 am
” Griggs v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:23 am
Here’s the intro from this Cooley blog by Cydney Posner (and here’s a blog on whether Congress will actually revisit the conflict minerals rule): According to this article from the Washington Post with Bloomberg, in February, House Financial Services Committee Chair Jeb Hensarling and three other House members (Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Bill Huizenga of Michigan, and Ed Royce of California) sent a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White urging that the SEC end its appeal of the conflict… [read post]
