Search for: "Grimes v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
September 13, 2018) (purported collective and class action removed from state court brought by hourly security guards under federal and state wage and hour laws alleging defendant failed to pay overtime compensation for duties that were required for the job) Wiggins v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  The column is notionally on the McConnell-Grimes Senate race in Kentucky, but the subtext is brought to the fore in the conclusion:  The backdrop of this election is a profound gloom about the state of our continuing national experiment in self-government. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
" Though not controlling for the purpose of notice or precedent, this case is similar to Grimes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:14 pm by Dean Freeman
State of Florida, July 15, 2016, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Grimes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:41 pm by Carl Neff
Advaxis moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), under the premise that if there was an agreement to sell the stock to KCM, was never memorialized by a writing and that its board of directors never approved the issuance of Advaxis stock to KCM, in violation of Grimes v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:25 am by Susan Brenner
Grime Scenes Revealed, According to Traveler Cleanliness Ratings. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:17 pm by R.J. MacReady
Here's a link to the unpublished court of appeals opinion.PD-0298-09, Sherry Lynn Grimes v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
July 26, 2018) (putative class action brought by emergency room doctors alleging, in a 210-page complaint, that opioid drug manufacturers and distributors contributed to the “opioid epidemic” by disseminating false and deceptive statements about the safety and effects of opioids in violation of RICO and state law) Grimes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:40 am
The Plaintiffs' lawyers in this case were Ober, Kaler, Grimes, & Shriver, a firm that usually finds itself on the other side of the "v". [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:40 am
The Plaintiffs' lawyers in this case were Ober, Kaler, Grimes, & Shriver, a firm that usually finds itself on the other side of the "v". [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]