Search for: "Grogan v. State" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
Hungar, it seems to me that RCA would matter, even under your view of the world, because if you think that Congress did not codify the existing state of the law as to the standard of proof and you think that section 282 was essentially silent as to the standard of proof, then the question is, what do we do? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:39 pm by GuestPost
 If we reduce the judgment to its core, one might even say that the Court simply reiterated the point made by McCarthy J in the X case in 1992 (repeated by Hardiman J in Roche v Roche) when he stated in, admittedly, more trenchant terms: “In the context of the eight years that have passed since the Amendment was adopted and the two years since Grogan’s case the failure by the legislature to enact the appropriate legislation is no longer just unfortunate;… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/830231.co1.pdf State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:39 am
Rescinding a letter of resignationGrogan v Holland Patent CSD, App. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:23 am
As if on cue, the New York State Court of Appeals addressed the issue anew about a week after the Grogan decision. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:47 pm
Marion County Election Board, No. 07-21, that involved Indiana's voter ID law; U.S. v. [read post]