Search for: "Group House v. Bd of Zoning"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
State of California, IHSS, legally uninsured, administered by York Risk Services Group, a Sedgwick Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
Heilmann (7th Cir. 2006) (upholding dismissal of administrative hearing officer because he decided local vehicular, housing, and zoning matters on which "political careers may turn" and elected officials "may insist that the holders of the delegated power be reliable implementers" of their agendas); Hoard v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
State Water Resources Control Bd., (December 15, 2021) 2021 Cal.App.LEXIS 1052. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
In Meraki Recovery Housing, LLC et al v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
If this happens, the zoning code requires the fraternity's landlord to evict the fraternity—or, if the fraternity (or its national organization) owns its own house, it has to vacate the house. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm
Group homes, zoning and the Fair Housing Act Valencia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Furthermore, subsequent zoning actions may be relevant to both land value and damages, or special benefits. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
2018 Update Exemptions McCorkle Eastside Neighborhood Group v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
McCorkle Eastside Neighborhood Group, et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
Monterey County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 117.) [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
There is a large, bright yellow sign at the Israel-Syrian Border: “MORTAL DANGER – MILITARY ZONE. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
” Bd. of Educ. of Kiryas Joel Vill. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
(E.g., San Diego Citizenry Group v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557, 568-570 (1995), are speech under the First Amendment because of the message they convey, so too is a marriage ceremony. [read post]
