Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger"
Results 161 - 180
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm
Andrade (2003), Grutter v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
The tenth anniversary of Grutter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm
Bollinger, and Grutter v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:32 am
The concept of “critical mass” comes directly from the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:58 am
Bollinger, the University of Michigan affirmative action case decidedi n 2003. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), and Gratz v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
Supreme Court found constitutional in Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:07 pm
In Sander v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:57 pm
Texas, the 1996 decision striking down an affirmative action program at the University of Texas Law School that Grutter v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:13 am
In granting certiorari, the Supreme Court agreed to consider whether it should overrule its decision in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
It is even possible that the Court will overrule Grutter v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 10:31 pm
More recently, in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:43 am
Bollinger, which allowed race to be considered in college admissions, and Hamdi v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
In 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor relied on Powell’s diversity rationale when deciding Grutter v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Harvard (SFFA) functionally overruled cases like Grutter v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
PCAOB: Cases this Term in which Justice Thomas’ reasoning may be unique among the Justices’ 11:19—Dissatisfaction with the Court’s desegregation cases; clerking for Thomas during the affirmative action case Grutter v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:03 am
In 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote the 5-4 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:26 pm
Bollinger). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:45 pm
Recognizing this interest, in Grutter v. [read post]
